If I Were A Writer At The WSJ...
Supporters of Sen. Hillary Clinton suggested she would like to be Sen. Barack Obama's running mate, but close advisers to Sen. Obama are signaling that an Obama-Clinton ticket is highly unlikely.
Some in the Clinton camp also noted a possible deal-breaker for a party-unity ticket: Bill Clinton may balk at releasing records of his business dealings and big donors to his presidential library.
Before they include such a comment in the story, maybe they ought to consider the situation - what was Bill Clinton going to do if his wife was the nominee? If he was prepared to release the records at that point, why would he balk if she were the VP candidate?
Posted by PSoTD on
Thursday June 5, 2008 at 7:14am |
You never source nor verify any story about Bill Clinton.
OK, so it looks like Vanity Fair is in the process of being sued over it's story, but defamation of character lawsuits are always good for more sex articles in "family" publications.
The WSJ is now part of the New York Post, but they haven't realized it yet.
I'm waiting for the nudes on page three.