PSoTD

I Guess I Have to Wonder

Once again about the Washington Post's priority for important stories. I don't blame James Carville for having the kind of personality that desires attention from all at all times, but I don't understand why the Washington Post thinks that what he has to say in this writeup would interest anyone at all. Who cares?

Posted by PSoTD on Saturday March 29, 2008 at 9:32pm |
Vail Beach (mail):
Lotsa people are interested apparently. Top story on Memeorandum, prominent play in RealClearPolitics. You've got problems with a lot of people's judgment, not just the Post's.

It's a dramatic little tale. Carville has a point; Richardson has stabbed his chief sponsor in the back. It does not speak well of him. He better hope Obama wins it all or else he's a political corpse.

But at the same time, the unspoken subtext is, the Clintons don't have their old schwack. Carville doesn't want to admit that part of the story, but the fact is, if Hillary and Bill held the Democratic Party in the same thrall they did for the previous 16 years, no way Richardson would've crossed them.
3.29.2008 10:27pm
PSoTD (mail) (www):
Once it's in the media, sure, it can get linked. The point isn't why bloggers waste pixels - hell I did that. The question is why the Post wasted paper. Dramatic? Yes, it's 5th grade drama queen stuff, so if you like that, hurrah. I guess there isn't anything more dramatic - or important - for the Post to be spending that paper on.
3.30.2008 7:57am

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?
You don't have to register to post comments. Just use Guest option.