Once again about the Washington Post's priority for important stories. I don't blame James Carville for having the kind of personality that desires attention from all at all times, but I don't understand why the Washington Post thinks that what he has to say in this writeup would interest anyone at all. Who cares?



It's a dramatic little tale. Carville has a point; Richardson has stabbed his chief sponsor in the back. It does not speak well of him. He better hope Obama wins it all or else he's a political corpse.
But at the same time, the unspoken subtext is, the Clintons don't have their old schwack. Carville doesn't want to admit that part of the story, but the fact is, if Hillary and Bill held the Democratic Party in the same thrall they did for the previous 16 years, no way Richardson would've crossed them.