PSoTD

Imus Story Isn't Going Away

Proof: Here, Here, Here, Here, and elsewhere...

Unfortunately, Imus can't do the prideful thing and disappear from public view. Exposed as beyond insensitive and suspected of being quite racist, he can't see the damage he's caused and continues to cause.

I'm not talking this time about the Rutgers basketball team, or black women. I'm talking about the television pundit class. He's accidentally exposed them for what they are - hypocrits. They sit and verbally judge and lay down moral judgements all the time as part of their job, but they don't seem to see themselves as part of that same spectrum, subject to the same pressures, and targets of the same blame industry that they worked so hard to create.

In this respect, Imus is doing us an unintentional favor. This hypocrisy - the "judge others by my words, but not me" approach to infotainment has long sickened the national debate. The practitioners of it need to be excised from that debate, for the health of discussion. The lineup of people supporting Imus are the people supporting, and benefitting, from this hypocrisy. So, in a way, it's good for them to stand up, and proudly proclaim their solidarity with this cancerous punditocracy. We now know more about who deserves a speedier exit from the public eye - and this includes the programming management at MSNBC.

Posted by PSoTD on Wednesday April 11, 2007 at 8:15am |
Ted (mail) (www):
I tend to agree with the idea that the Imus show is, among many other things, Exhibit A of the problems stemming from the incestuous relationship among pop-pundits, journalists, and politicos.

Rather than continuing to pile on Imus (although he deserves it), we'd be better served by putting pressure on those who legitimize Imus by appearing on his show and defending him (what is Tom Oliphant thinking?).

ted



The Rhetoric Garage on L'affair D'Imus
4.11.2007 12:05pm
Dave Parker (mail):
Wow so many words and so little said. Hypocracy is right. Why single out Imus. I have grown so tired of the Bandwagon. The man made an ill concieved comment and it was wrong. Ok enough said. Who hasn't said things they wish they had not. You can justify the man loosing his job? I have heard worse on the Tom Joyner Morning Show, but if forgot, thats ok. yeah, Hypocracy is a very good word..

dave
4.12.2007 7:05pm
PSoTD (mail) (www):
Dave - extra credit next time for spelling properly any subject you wish to tackle. It's hypocrisy. Also, conceived, losing, etc. Hard to pay much attention to an opinion with such ignorant language skills. BTW, people lose their jobs all the time for failure to perform adequately. He lost a big chunk of advertisers. That's failure to perform.
4.12.2007 7:41pm

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?
You don't have to register to post comments. Just use Guest option.