I dunno, yesterday's bumbleheaded comment by Wolfson about Edwards' speech in Harlem still annoys the hell out of me. Why he or the Clinton campaign would attack the messenger for a message that should both be understood and accepted by Hillary Clinton is just horrible politics. Note - it's not governing. It's politics.
So who is Wolfson, anyway? He's a partner in the Glover Park Group. What do they do?
The Glover Park Group has bridged the divide -- offering comprehensive client service from the earliest strategic planning to the final execution of advocacy and image advertising campaigns.
Okay, then. He is part owner of a firm that claims to provide comprehensive message planning and execution. Were his comments of the other day really so comprehensive in either planning or execution? Seemed pretty reactionary and baiting, really.
More information about Glover Park Group here.
There's an odd little story going on about the company in the British Virgin Islands, but I'm not quite sure what it all means. Pieces of the story are here and here .
He has all the time in the world to campaign, with his wife in tow. How convenient. Hillary is a sitting Senator, working everyday, with all others members of congress, to fight what Bush is trying to do right now in Iraq. When Edwards delivered his low blow on Martin Luther King day, Hillary was in Iraq, not preaching in a church and bashing her fellow congressmen and congresswomen. All I have to say to John Edwards is "bad politics".