PSoTD

Thursday June 26, 2008 at 7:40am

President Anti-Draw

From the Laurel Manor website:

So, as this blurb shows, in the past this place has handled more than 1000 guests, and promotes that fact. This is location of the Michigan Republicans held their Max M. Fisher National Republican Award Dinner last night. Special guest: President George W. Bush. Fundraiser for Michigan Republicans. Bush is to give a speech. Big, big deal?

It drew a "crowd of about 325".

I wonder how many popped for $5000 for a photo with Bush. Seriously, in what universe would a photo of yourself with George W. Bush be worth $5000? What kind of skewed values would you need to have to make that cost/benefit decision?

Well, besides complaining about how much they pay in taxes...

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Thursday June 26, 2008 at 7:40am | Permalink | 0 Comments |

Friday June 20, 2008 at 7:13am

The Human Cocktail

As an officer in a local association, I just have to say, every once in a while you run into a person that is a combination of paranoia and ignorance that makes dealing with him or her an ordeal too stupid for words.

And sometimes there are two, married to each other, multiplying their powers of dunderheadedness to a degree that leaves the rational utterly bewildered.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Friday June 20, 2008 at 7:13am | Permalink | 3 Comments |

Friday June 20, 2008 at 6:39am

Greater Use of Bicycles on Public Roads

Might lead to a requirement of bicycle insurance. I can see a convergence of interests getting such an idea proposed as legislation.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Friday June 20, 2008 at 6:39am | Permalink | 0 Comments |

Wednesday June 18, 2008 at 5:58am

Is anti-Liebermanism still the liberalism of fools?

Because Liebermanism doesn't seem to be liberalism to me. Two year old blogging of a mistaken identity:

The Moose denounces the swiftboating of Joe.

The Moose found one of the most despicable moments of contemporary politics was when John Kerry's heroism in battle was called into question during the 2004 campaign. It was an attempt to rewrite history to depict a war hero as an opportunist. It was vile and disgusting.

Now the left is engaged in a swiftboating of Joe Lieberman. It is an attempt to falsely portray him as right wing Bush supporter. It is a vile lie. The truth is that Joe Lieberman is in the mainstream of a Democratic Party that could become a majority party. But does that party exist anymore?

With apologies to August Bebel, anti-Liebermanism is the liberalism of fools.

As the Moose has pointed out, by any reasonable standard, Joe is a liberal Democrat in good standing. Yes, he supports the war, but it is a blatant misrepresentation to suggest that he is anything but a liberal. (The good folks at the must read Lieberdem did some marvelous research on this question - here)

...

Yesterday, the lefty bloggers attempted to spread the disinformation that Joe might run as a Republican despite the fact that he has made it clear that he will caucus with the Democrats even if he runs as an independent. The left knows no limit to their hatred of Lieberman. It is deep. It is irrational. And it has the potential to damage the Democratic Party for many years to come.

Wrong then. Wrong today.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Wednesday June 18, 2008 at 5:58am | Permalink | 0 Comments |

Tuesday June 10, 2008 at 12:36pm

If the U.S. Taxes Maria Bartiromo's Income 100%

that could mean lower taxes for dozens of people. Let's do it!!!!

(Not serious, but it's hard to take her very seriously, either)

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Tuesday June 10, 2008 at 12:36pm | Permalink | 0 Comments |

Monday June 9, 2008 at 11:41am

Pearls You Have To Deal With

Michelle Obama

How will voters deal with Michelle Obama?

“Those are not little ‘Breakfast at Tiffany’s’ pearls,” Ms. Taylor said. “Those are large pearls. Those are pearls you have to deal with.” It could be, of course, that voters won’t warm up to a pearls-you-have-to-deal-with personality.

I think she'd make a heckuva lot more interesting first lady than Cindy McCain.

Posted by lyzurgyk
Posted on Monday June 9, 2008 at 11:41am | Permalink | 3 Comments |

Sunday June 8, 2008 at 7:37am

It Wasn't My Fault!!

It was the fundraisers! Or just fate.

I suppose Mark Penn wrote this just to give people one last chance to laugh at him.

I don't think it's going to work. There should be some sort of blogger-based fundraiser at some point to help Hillary Clinton with her campaign debt, and I'm sure many bloggers will do so, but while sharing the sentiment that they really don't like any of their donation going to Penn.

I can't think of one person in politics the past year who has seen their professional reputation sink as far as Mark Penn, and that includes all the zombies working for Bush.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Sunday June 8, 2008 at 7:37am | Permalink | 0 Comments |

Sunday June 8, 2008 at 7:27am

This isn’t exactly the party I’d planned, but I sure like the company.

Very classy speech by Hillary Clinton yesterday. What a great way to begin it, as well. I'd like to see some BIG Obama bloggers now blog promote some donation effort to assist the Clinton campaign in retiring their debt.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Sunday June 8, 2008 at 7:27am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Thursday June 5, 2008 at 7:24am

Government Web Site Pricing

This seems a bit arbitrary to me, pricing government web sites based on the number of people in the community.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Thursday June 5, 2008 at 7:24am | Permalink | 4 Comments |

Thursday June 5, 2008 at 7:14am

If I Were A Writer At The WSJ...

I'd wonder about this.

Supporters of Sen. Hillary Clinton suggested she would like to be Sen. Barack Obama's running mate, but close advisers to Sen. Obama are signaling that an Obama-Clinton ticket is highly unlikely.

Some in the Clinton camp also noted a possible deal-breaker for a party-unity ticket: Bill Clinton may balk at releasing records of his business dealings and big donors to his presidential library.

Before they include such a comment in the story, maybe they ought to consider the situation - what was Bill Clinton going to do if his wife was the nominee? If he was prepared to release the records at that point, why would he balk if she were the VP candidate?

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Thursday June 5, 2008 at 7:14am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Wednesday June 4, 2008 at 11:50am

I wonder...

What would Hillary Clinton do if John McCain offered her the VP spot?

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Wednesday June 4, 2008 at 11:50am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Wednesday June 4, 2008 at 9:21am

McCain

This assessment of McCain last night in his speech is spot on. It WAS creepy, especially the little chuckles.

Three images from last night’s TV coverage will stay with me for years.

1. McCain’s reptitious, ill-timed, and creepier-than-usual grin … like the Cheshire cat on sedatives.

It's like these Republicans have adopted the Beavis and Butthead laugh styles. First Bush, now McCain.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Wednesday June 4, 2008 at 9:21am | Permalink | 0 Comments |

Wednesday June 4, 2008 at 7:24am

Why Hillary Shouldn't Be Obama's VP

I think that over the next three months, Hillary's speech last night will be seen as another major bungling of her campaign. She is not in the position to try to negotiate, as David Gergen said last night, a "coalition government", and that IS how she sounded last night. Let me say that again: reality does not put her in position to act as she did last night.

Saying she's going to take some time to decide what's next is absolutely fine. There's a political reality to this, though, and it is this - nobody else is going to wait. Obama is moving forward. McCain is moving forward. The news media is moving forward. It's over, regardless of when she wants to admit this on stage.

What isn't politically savvy is this notion that she's somehow representative of nearly 18 million voters now, and that she somehow is supposed to negotiate for them. She is not, no more than Obama is representative of nearly 18 million voters. They are now representative of delegates. Those delegates are representative of the voters. Delegates that want this wrapped up, delegates that want the strongest position in November, delegates that want to win. They know that Clinton won't be the candidate. There will be a swift and strong movement to prove that, and to take Clinton off the media pedestal of candidacy. There's no need for her muddying up the actual candidate's message.

She has to know that. She also has to know that last night's speech wasn't particularly diplomatic, or healing, to the entire Democratic Party. She has to know that it would tick off Obama supporters. She has to know that the oxygen for her publicity as a candidate has perhaps a few more days left before it starts to diminish to the layers now enjoyed by Biden and Kucinich and Dodd.

She has to know that if she tries one more speech like last night, she's going to get the royal shove up her backside publicly by the party leadership.

What she seems to not understand is how much the calendar is going to work against her now. There's no need for Obama to select a VP candidate right now, and in fact there's plenty of reason for him to hold off, as it is a process that generates free positive media coverage for his candidacy and he should hold that as a buildup to the convention. We're heading for a couple of months where Obama and McCain will have the stage, that cooler heads will prevail on the direction of the fall campaign, and most importantly, where Obama can appeal directly to those primary voters for Clinton and review polling data to see how he's doing. He can run trial balloons for VP and see how people react.

She's not in position to call the shots for her being VP now, and as time goes by, whatever strength she might have is going to disappear. Any effort for her to do so now should be resisted. If she doesn't understand the power dynamic right now, there's very little to suggest that she'd understand it from the position of Vice President.

Put another way - Vice President is NOT Co-President. And there's no way that Obama should select as a running mate someone who seems to think it could be. And there's quadruple no way that Obama should select a VP candidate that pretends there could be a co-presidency but would make no leadership effort to take such responsibility:

Though some might think her remarks self-delusional, Clinton wasn't kidding herself; earlier in the day, Clinton had told lawmakers privately that the race was over and she would consider being Obama's vice president. Her public defiance reflected a shift in the balance of power that came with Obama's victory. Now that he had won the race, he would need to woo Clinton if he wanted to prevail in November.

"Obama has work to do," the outspoken Clinton adviser Lanny Davis told reporters in the hallway outside the gymnasium here. "Senator Clinton can't do it for him."

Well, I already didn't think she was a leader. Thanks for confirming, Lanny.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Wednesday June 4, 2008 at 7:24am | Permalink | 0 Comments |

Monday June 2, 2008 at 6:42am

Puerto Rico

At some point I need to be enlightened. I guess I just don't understand why we have elections that allow people to vote in the primary when they cannot vote in the general election. This seems to me to be stupid policy for the Democratic Party. If, somehow, the Democratic primary election was determined by the delegates delivered by the Puerto Rico primary, how would that sit with the rest of the voting United States?

In other words, why in the hell would we allow voters that cannot participate in the general election determine who would be in that general election? I have plenty of sympathy for the political limbo that Puerto Ricans may feel they are in, but this process allowance isn't moving any closer to resolving their situation at all.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Monday June 2, 2008 at 6:42am | Permalink | 0 Comments |