There's a lot of negativity to the term "hippie" these days, and negativity to whoever may be perceived to have been one at one time. Kids tend to define hippies with one visible trait - long hair. Long-haired males are/were hippies, long-haired women could have been. Kids today aren't aware of many other visible possibilities, such as bell bottom jeans and flower power shirts, and are definitely not really aware of some subcultural aspects, such as drug experimentation and opposition to war.
I heard my six year old negatively talking about hippies earlier in the summer, and I tried to find out where he got this talk from. Not from us. Kindergarten? Friends? Neighbor kids? He seemed to have just absorbed it from the attitudes of some in Central Pennsylvania, with no specific authorship. A few weeks ago I had to pull out some photos, me and some friends when I was in high school and in college. Long hair. Facial hair.
"Dad was a hippie" he laughed.
I explained to him that there was nothing wrong about being a hippie. Some people might call me a hippie, some might not. I was a long-hair for a while. I wore jeans with holes in them before they sold them like that. People can call me a hippie if they want. I don't see it as a bad thing. Hippies did a lot of good things - they helped raise the nation's understanding to stop an awful war, they worked to make things more fair for people. They promoted love. They sought new solutions. There's a lot to respect about what the "hippies" of the 1960s and 1970s did.
I haven't heard him talk negatively about hippies since then. I can't be sure that I made a point, or if he just is smart enough to avoid the topic so he doesn't have to look at those old photos again. But I think it's time that parents quit allowing the bashing of hippies by those ignorant of the time period. And kids ought to know that having long hair certainly isn't something that should be disparaged.


