PSoTD

Friday May 26, 2006 at 3:42pm

Do Republicans Buy More of Timmy's Books?

Here's Russert's guests for Meet the Press this Sunday.

Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-NE, & House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-WI, David Broder, David Ignatius, Kate O'Beirne, Eugene Robinson.

Just another week of sepia news coverage by Timmy Russert. Wondering what the count of Republicans versus Democrats, as far as current and former elected and appointed officials are, for 2006? With this weekend's show, it looks like this:

26 Republicans
12 Democrats

I realize the Democrats are out of power, but they need to start talking loudly, and in public, about this guest distribution on Meet the Press. Russert is approach Foxland. Congressional Democrats shouldn't just limply accept it.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Friday May 26, 2006 at 3:42pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Tuesday May 23, 2006 at 1:06am

Good for Google

P.S. - This isn't really a news site, and neither were these conservative bloggers. Opinion by bloggers isn't news - it's expected. So get over it.

Now, if we could just get Google to stop including the Opinion Urinal...

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Tuesday May 23, 2006 at 1:06am | Permalink | 0 Comments |

Sunday May 14, 2006 at 9:39pm

Is It Me?

Or is it a little gruesome that ABC has bought Google Advertising for this:

Flight 93 - Final Moments

Listen to Final Radio Transmissions from Flight 93 on 9/11.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Sunday May 14, 2006 at 9:39pm | Permalink | 0 Comments |

Saturday May 13, 2006 at 10:40am

Ratings

Anyone know if the Nielsen Ratings for the Colbert Report have shown if Stephen Colbert's ratings have gone up since the White House Correspondents Dinner?

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Saturday May 13, 2006 at 10:40am | Permalink | 4 Comments |

Thursday May 11, 2006 at 8:06am

How Much Sex Should A General Newspaper Cover?

Apparently, descriptive anal sex coverage is too much.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Thursday May 11, 2006 at 8:06am | Permalink | 0 Comments |

Tuesday May 9, 2006 at 9:25am

I've been thinking about Cohen's article some more

Supposedly, 3000 people were so fired up about his Colbert article that they wrote him email. Angry emails. Not particularly well-written emails. Missives.

What is Cohen's response? To blame the very readers who cared enough about what Cohen had to say to write him. To chastise them for their anger. To preemptively blame them if Republicans win in the fall. It's beyond arrogant. It's stupid. Is Cohen saying that people shouldn't care about what he writes, that they shouldn't react, that they shouldn't disagree, that they shouldn't be passionate about what he writes?

I mean, I agree in a way. He's an egotist, inserting himself into his pieces, and who could really care about that beyond his family and small assembly of friends? But still, is he really saying that people shouldn't care about what he writes? Does he believe that to be the case for the entire staff of the Washington Post? Does he really have that low of an opinion about the value of what he is doing?

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Tuesday May 9, 2006 at 9:25am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Tuesday May 9, 2006 at 8:20am

Fattened

Poor Richard Cohen.

Then I wrote about Stephen Colbert and his unfunny performance at the White House correspondents' dinner.

Kapow! Within a day, I got more than 2,000 e-mails...

Truth to tell, I peeked into only a few of the e-mails. I did this because I would sometimes recognize a name I thought I knew, which was almost always a mistake. When I guilelessly clicked on the name, I would get a bucket of raw, untreated and disease-laden verbal sewage right in the face.

I'd be willing to accept the news media's growing "the left bloggers are so mean and angry" if they would even try to figure out why we're angry. They take no responsibility. Is it because we've watched these people fritter away their responsibilities, year after year, to speak truth to power, or just the plain truth for the sake of truth? Is it because we see many of them as fattened guinea pigs held in the cages of Washington politicians, with no effort to do anything for themselves? Is it because we see many of them culpable in spreading the lies, and hiding the truth, of the current Republican regime? Is it because we believe that many of them are holding their jobs as a matter of privilege and not retaining it based on any marketplace value analysis?

Yes, yes, yes, yes. Still, I don't hate you, Richard Cohen. In fact, if you were somewhere else - like Kansas City or Manitoba or Gas City, Indiana, I might really, really like you. But I don't like you in Washington. I don't like you covering national stories. You're not funny nor smart nor do you say things at the appropriate time. You have an audience smaller than many bloggers, not exactly American Idol numbers. You're everything you complained Colbert was except honest. So shut up about it already.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Tuesday May 9, 2006 at 8:20am | Permalink | 3 Comments |

Saturday May 6, 2006 at 9:25pm

Primetime Spelling Bee

The Cynic pointed out something pretty cool: ABC will be broadcasting the Scripps National Spelling Bee on primetime television next month. First time!

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Saturday May 6, 2006 at 9:25pm | Permalink | 0 Comments |

Friday May 5, 2006 at 12:25pm

Russert Is Going to Ask The Tough Questions Sunday

Get ready for the grilling of George W. Bush... impersonator Steve Bridges.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Friday May 5, 2006 at 12:25pm | Permalink | 0 Comments |

Wednesday May 3, 2006 at 7:31am

Nice Thorough Research

Love this little bit about the guy who booked Stephen Colbert for the White House Correspondents' Association:

Mark Smith, a reporter for The Associated Press who is president of the White House Correspondents' Association, acknowledges that he had not seen much of Stephen Colbert on Comedy Central before he booked him as the main entertainment for the association's annual black-tie dinner on Saturday night. But he says he knew enough about Mr. Colbert — "He not only skewers politicians, he skewers those of us in the media" — to expect that he would cause some good-natured discomfort among the 2,600 guests, many of them politicians and reporters.

And so, the White House Correspondents' Association work ethic becomes part of the story. What, due diligence? Consider what Colbert's previous employer - Jon Stewart - did in a visit one day to CNN as a possible example of what they might be booking?

It is delicious. Assumption and acceptance of "normal" behavior towards a President who is anything but behaving normally gives the Association a black eye. Wonder if Bush or the Republicans think Mark Smith did this on purpose? So, add a new level of distrust towards them as well.

Lazy work ethic. Distrust of their intentions and their statements. Inability to see reality the way 68% of the nation does. Colbert's performance continues to reveal the correspondents in a way they can't find flattering, and the rest of the nation can't find very hopeful.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Wednesday May 3, 2006 at 7:31am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Monday May 1, 2006 at 5:47pm

So What's Jon Gonna Say About It?

I'm not sure what's going to be more newsworthy - seeing how Jon Meacham, Managing Editor of Newsweek, deals with Colbert's performance this weekend, or if Jon Stewart pays Stephen Colbert some sort of tribute tonight...

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Monday May 1, 2006 at 5:47pm | Permalink | 0 Comments |

Monday May 1, 2006 at 2:59pm

QotD: White House Correspondent Dinner

Today's timely question:

Does the White House Correspondent Dinner hurt America?

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Monday May 1, 2006 at 2:59pm | Permalink | 0 Comments |

Monday May 1, 2006 at 12:19pm

Steve Bridges Might Survive This Career Move

Fortunately for him, he really doesn't look like George W. Bush. It's mostly makeup.

But really, he's heading to a career choice. Either drop the Bush impressions from his act, give them some real zing, or be remembered as the guy who did candy-assed imitations of Bush that Bush actually approved of... which will doom him to a career of guest entertainer to ever-dwindling audiences at State GOP functions.

BTW, who paid for Bridges' appearance at the White House Correspondent Dinner?

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Monday May 1, 2006 at 12:19pm | Permalink | 0 Comments |