Duncan has an interesting post up called The Coming Blogwars in which he recognizes that the liberal blogosphere is likely to be pretty divisive in the upcoming Democratic Party presidential primary campaign.
I guess there are two areas of concern - that the perception that "big bloggers" will have "undue influence" on the web in the campaigns is the one Eschaton focuses on, and I suppose that's a legitimate concern. There is a way to get around it, of course, but it goes hand in hand with the second concern, which is more mine than anything I've seen anywhere else.
I know people get interested in the horserace status of the campaign, and the focus of how one candidate would match up against a Republican better than another, yadda yadda yadda. I'm not. I'm sick of it. I think it sucks. I think it's that demand of result over resolve that has gotten the Democrats into the minority status it finds itself today. I'm not complaining about it as far as the candidates go, because frankly, they do have to see things that way - individually. I'm complaining about it as far as the Party goes, as far as the news media goes, and, I'm afraid, where the blogosphere is rushing towards. It is the focus on how a candidate can be most electable, as opposed as to why a candidate should be elected. I'm afraid that the Democrats haven't learned an important lesson yet - that's there's going to be disagreement and debate and division over EITHER question, and the "how" question doesn't get us a candidate that can convince non-Democrats that the candidate SHOULD be elected. Only the why question can do that. And if elected, it doesn't provide an inkling to the sizeable population that didn't vote for the candidate as to why they should support their governance. What was proved was that the candidate could be elected by the slimmest of margins. What wasn't proven was the translation of that result into governing. For the most recent example, see the current Administration. Getting elected is what Karl Rove's campaigns are all about. Governing effectively? No groundwork set.
I'd hate to see the blogosphere contribute to the problem. If we focus on why we should elect a candidate to govern - the platform, the positions, the expectations in governance, the capabilities - rather than why we should select a candidate that can be elected, then the blogosphere will be doing politics a grand benefit that history will remember. If the blogosphere acts just like the consultantocracy and the power news media, then we're no better than they, and history will probably forget us pretty damn quickly. Particularly on the liberal side, it's our choice on where to put the focus, and I hope we prove ourselves to be better than the existing power structures we've been reacting to the past several years.